Bakken – Page 29 – Peak Oil Barrel

A Look At OPEC Plus US States January Production Numbers

03/28/201403/29/2014 Ron Patterson 206 Comments

News Bulletin: Caught this on The Motley Fool:

Is Chesapeake’s Reduced Oil Production Growth Forecast Really That Bad?
But the company recently said that its crude oil production growth will slow dramatically this year — an announcement that clearly disappointed investors, judging by the immediate negative impact on Chesapeake’s share price. But is the guidance really that big of a deal?

I couldn’t find anything else about this story. Chesapeake doesn’t have anything in the Bakken but they are big in Eagle Ford. They drilled eight Bakken wells and they were all duds so they pulled out. But is this something that is happening to other Eagle Ford producers?

The notion persist that OPEC has millions of barrels per day of spare capacity and could increase production if only they desired to do so. Many, in fact most people, really believe that all 12 OPEC nations are operating as a cartel and that perhaps all OPEC nations could increase production if they got the word. I think that idea is absurd and only the truly naive and those who know virtually nothing about the history and ability of OPEC could possibly believe such nonsense. And OPEC has done nothing to squash that idea.

OPEC Upstream Spare Capacity
Spare OPEC crude oil capacity is set to stabilize at around 8 mb/d over the medium-term, rising from an average level of around 4 mb/d in 2011.

2011 was the year of the Libyan Revolution. At the beginning of that year three countries, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE, combined, did have about 1.6 mb/d of spare capacity. The other eight OPEC countries had none. And by January 2012 all 12 OPEC were producing flat out, in my opinion anyway.
However not everyone believe that OPEC has that much spare capacity.

US oil boom may cushion any Venezuelan supply shock CNBC
“A geo-political risk premium in crude oil prices related to Venezuela is likely non-existent at present,” said UBS commodity strategists Giovanni Staunovo and Dominic Schnider in an email to CNBC on Saturday. “This could change at any time considering OPEC’s spare capacity is between 2.5 and 3.0 million barrels a day and Venezuela produced 2.5 million barrels a day in January. A loss of a large share of this capacity would not pass crude oil prices unnoticed.”

Commodities Now
Using IEA figures for 2013, OECD Europe imported 3.05 Mb/d of crude oil from Russia, or 36% of their net crude oil imports. When refined products, NGLs, and other feedstocks are included, total net oil imports rose to 4.33 Mb/d, or 44%, of OECD Europe’s net oil imports. These volumes far exceed Saudi/OPEC spare capacity of less than 2 Mb/d.

I found many statements on the web talking about how the markets get jittery when spare capacity gets too low and when it gets high they settle down. My question is: <b>How do they know?</b> So let me show you some production charts and see what you think.

EDIT: To those who believe Saudi has spare capacity I would just like to point out that Sadad Al Husseini, a former executive at Saudi Aramco, disagrees with you.
“This is strictly, totally business,” said Sadad Al Husseini, a former executive at Saudi Aramco, the state oil company.
“Saudi production is flat out. Where you send it is a matter of where you make the best profit.”

The above eight OPEC countries are clearly in decline. the two vertical lines mark the actual cut in production by OPEC responding to the price collapse in late 2008. One year later all eight nations were producing flat out again. The slanted line shows the actual decline in production for these eight OPEC countries. The end of the line marks the “approximate” spot where their production would be except for the Iran sanctions and the Libyan political problems.

One of those eight, Shell Vice President says that Nigeria, is is steep decline.
Nigeria’s Crude Oil Production Decline Rates Pegged at 20 Per Cent

The Vice President of Shell Upstream International, Mr. Markus Droll has said that decline rates in crude oil production within Nigeria’s hydrocarbon industry can be as high as 15 to 20 per cent.

Droll also said that replacing such natural production decline rates in the industry requires more funds than is currently available and that the peculiar high cost operational environment of Nigeria has further compounded the situation.

Here are the other OPEC countries with the exception of Saudi Arabia. Iraq has advertised the fact that they want to produce 12 mb/d but they are a long way from that number. But there is no question that they are producing every barrel possible.

Kuwait and the UAW did cut production after the collapse of 2008. And unlike the other eight, they both, along with Saudi Arabia kept those cuts through 2010. Then when the Libyan revolution hit in 2011 they all began to ramp up production as much and as fast as they could. And by 2012 every OPEC nation was again producing flat out.

Read More

Texas RRC Crude and Condensate Data, Is Eagle Ford Peaking?

03/21/201403/24/2014 Ron Patterson 113 Comments

This page Texas Oil and Gas Production was last updated on February 18. However the data on this page has been updated. And the January production has been updated also: Oil and Gas Production Data Query then check “Lease”, “Both”, Statewide and then punch in the appropriate dates. Then when the next page comes up click on “Monthly Totals”. This brings up the updated monthly totals for Crude, Casinghead Gas, Gas Well Gas and Condensate.

There were revisions going back to July 2010 but only 2013 had any major revisions though there were some 2012 revisions also as the chart below shows.

The earlier revisions were smaller and there were some of them that were negative. That is the figures were revised downward.

This chart compares Texas with North Dakota. This is all Texas not just Eagle Ford. The last data point for all is January 2014.

Though there is a lot of conventional production in Texas, the increase is nevertheless about all tight oil. And these two states produce perhaps 95% of all tight oil produced in the United States. And that is about 2 million barrels so far if the Texas RRC is close.

Read More

Bakken Update with January Production Numbers

03/14/201403/20/2014 Ron Patterson 261 Comments

Second Update: I am still waiting for the Texas Railroad Commission monthly update. I had hoped it would be out today. However I will have a new post out tomorrow evening, March 21, whether they update tomorrow, or not. I have some good graphs from Jean Laherrere and one from Roger Blanchard that I will post.

Okay Another Update: Dennis Coyne has just posted me the numbers and link for Texas Condensate production. Now we can finally figure out what is going on in Texas.

More tomorrow

The North Dakota January production data is out for The Bakken and All North Dakota. Bakken production was up by 6,031 bp/d to 871,672 bp/d. But that was after December production was revised up by 2,744 bp/d. All North Dakota production was up by 6,446 to 933,133 bp/d. But that was after December production was revised up by 3,460 bp/d.

From the Director’s Cut

The drilling rig count was down from Dec to Jan and the number of well completions
dropped from 119 to 60. Days from spud to initial production decreased 10 days to 122.

Investor confidence appears to be growing. There are over 100 wells shut in for the Tioga gas plant conversion in an attempt to minimize flaring, but the biggest production impact story continues to be the weather. January temperatures were only 6 degrees below normal with only 3 days too cold for fracturing work, and there were no major snow events, but 12 days had sustained wind speeds too high for well completion work.

At the end of Jan there were about 660 wells waiting on completion services, an increase of 25.

North Dakota wells increased by 59 to 9,734 while Bakken wells increased by 92 to 6,926.

Perhaps it is just bad weather but there is definitely a slowdown in number of wells.

Read More

The EIA’s Drilling Productivity Report, Ghana and China

03/10/201403/10/2014 Ron Patterson 59 Comments

The EIA’s latest Drilling Productivity Report has been published. I found some strange things in the report. For the Bakken, their data does not jive with that posted by North Dakota. I have plotted the two together. The North Dakota includes all North Dakota but not the Montana part of the Bakken. The EIA data includes all the Bakken but not the non-Bakken part of North Dakota. Almost a wash but not quite. Montana produces slightly more than the non-Bakken part of North Dakota, but not very much. Anyway…

I thought for sure that the EIA would hear that Bakken Production was down about 50,000 barrels per day in December. But Nooooo… they have the Bakken up by over 20,000 barrels per day in December, a difference of 70,000 bp/d. But up until the last two or three months they follow the North Dakota data pretty close so we can hope they update their data in a few months.

However all LTO production was revised upward in this last report. The chart below is the barrels per day that all tight oil was revised upward.

Doesn’t the strange shape of that chart raise suspicions? December production was revised upward by 34,672 bp/d when it actually should have been revised downward by perhaps twice that amount. January production was revised upward by 35,243 barrels per day. I doubt very much that this was the actual case.

Read More

EIA’s Petroleum Supply Monthly by State, Texas Reporting Problems

02/28/201402/28/2014 Ron Patterson 319 Comments

The EIA releases two monthly petroleum data sets for US oil production. The Monthly Energy Review which gives the US production and consumption of all forms of energy, oil, natural gas, coal and electricity. The other, the Petroleum Supply Monthly deals only with petroleum but gives every possible statistic, production, refining, export and import from every state and district.

Concerning total US crude oil production the two should agree but they don’t. From December 2011 back they have the exact same production numbers but the near months differ greatly. I have found that the latter, the Petroleum Supply Monthly is the most accurate. The Monthly Energy Review usually changes their numbers to match the Petroleum Supply Monthly but both revise their numbers as more accurate numbers come in. They both are published the last week of the month but the M.E.R is always a month ahead with their data.

Here are their the numbers in KB/d and the difference between the two.

Notice that the former had US production up by 333 kb/d in December while the latter had US production down by 77 kb/d in December. But both will be revised to match what each state or pad reports later on.

There is no uniform reporting strategy among different states. They all appear to do it differently and on a different time frame. For instance the PSM, which is the only one of the two that reports state by state production number, reports the exact same numbers for North Dakota that we get from North Dakota. But they get their Texas data from the Texas Rail Road Commission. And the Texas RRC is very delinquent with their reporting. They just report the numbers as they come in from the field and every month they change as more numbers come in, sometimes taking many months until all the numbers are in. So the EIA just guesses at Texas production numbers.

Texas and North Dakota daily C+C production in KB/D. The last data point is December 2013.

Notice the last nine months are extremely linear. In fact each month, April through December, Texas monthly crude production increased by exactly 50,000 barrels per day.
Read More